| Title |
A biologically inspired, flapping-wing, hybrid aerial-aquatic microrobot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Robotics, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/scirobotics.aao5619 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yufeng Chen, Hongqiang Wang, E Farrell Helbling, Noah T Jafferis, Raphael Zufferey, Aaron Ong, Kevin Ma, Nicholas Gravish, Pakpong Chirarattananon, Mirko Kovac, Robert J Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 81% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 280 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 151 | 54% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 360. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#89,138
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Science Robotics
#78
of 630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,966
of 338,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Robotics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 165.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.